Year Two of the BCS Adds New Wrinkles
Story Links
Aug. 14, 1999
By The Associated Press
Year Two of the Bowl Championship Series will bring a few new wrinkles tothe process of selecting the teams to play in its national championship game.
The BCS made a mostly successful debut last season, with Tennessee beatingFlorida State in the Fiesta Bowl and becoming the unanimous choice as thenational champion.
This time, the BCS modified its guidelines for selecting teams by addingfive new computer ratings and toughened eligibility standards for its four bowlgames. Also, a process is now in place that could strip weaker conferences ofautomatic bids, a move aimed at the Big East.
The BCS standings are determined through four factors: a combined ranking inThe Associated Press media poll and USA Today/ESPN coaches’ poll, computersurveys, strength of schedule, and won-loss record.
The series will again use the computer ratings of Jeff Sagarin, The New YorkTimes and the Seattle Times. But it also will consider Richard Billingsley,Dunkel Index, Kenneth Massey, David Rothman and Matthews-Scripps Howard. Aschool’s lowest ranking from the eight computer services will be thrown out.
Champions from the Big East, Big Ten, Big 12, SEC, Atlantic Coast and Pac-10conferences receive automatic bids to the BCS, which also includes two at-largeteams.
The 1-2 teams in the BCS standings are matched in a national title game thatrotates among the Rose, Sugar, Orange and Fiesta bowls. Using a regionalformat, the other three bowls select the remaining conference champions andat-large teams.
The 2000 title game will be held Jan. 4 at the Sugar Bowl in New Orleans.
Last season, teams were eligible for at-large berths with either eightvictories or by finishing no lower than 12th in the BCS standings. Now, teamsmust have nine regular-season wins over Division I-A opponents and at least aNo. 12 ranking.
Also, each of the six BCS leagues must show it is worthy of that status. Ifa conference’s automatic qualifiers failed to average at least a No. 12 BCSrating over a four-year period, it could be stripped of the bid.
Last season, Big East champion Syracuse (8-4) was 15th in the BCS standingsand was routed by Florida 31-10 in the Orange Bowl.
One of the misconceptions of the BCS involved Kansas State, which ended upin the Alamo Bowl after losing only one game – the Big 12 championship – andfinishing third in the final BCS standings. The feeling was that K-State, whichlost to Purdue in the Alamo Bowl, deserved to play in a BCS game.
“We still feel the bowls, after you get past the 1-2 game, need to havesome regional flexibility,” BCS chairman Roy Kramer said. “You can’t take twoWest Coast teams and play in Miami. You’ve got to have regional ties to makethe bowls succeed.”
The first BCS standings will be released Oct. 25.